[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sc-dev] atomic, priority, semaphores
- To: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [sc-dev] atomic, priority, semaphores
- From: Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:05:35 +0100
- In-reply-to: <FE66B56EF1E84A609E808EC22E0B194F@victorPortatil>
- List-id: SuperCollider developers mailing list <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
- References: <FE66B56EF1E84A609E808EC22E0B194F@victorPortatil>
- Reply-to: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
> We had previously worked three changes that were only in my local
> repository -1:was to let atomic be included by commenting #define
> BOOST_LOCKFREE_NO_HDR_ATOMIC Is this worthwhile? How should be done
> properly
wait for boost 1.53, which has several fixes for both boost.atomic and
boost.lockfree
> 2:was to set realtime priority (I dont know if it is important)
it is needed, but i was confused, which version you ended up using.
> 3:was to implement win32 semaphores which I think that incremented
> stability and that I send you as file semaphore_win32.hpp and has
> worked for me.
let me have a look again (btw, patches are much nicer to deal with than
just files, as they can be applied with `git am')
tim
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/