[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] actual format of sc and scd files...

On Tuesday 22 December 2009 10:34:45 Scott Wilson wrote:
> They don't AFAIK. I think it's just done automatically when they're
> opened.
> 
> S.
> 
> On 22 Dec 2009, at 16:28, ronald kuivila wrote:
> > How do they remember that they are syntax colorized?

scel does auto syntax colorize in sclang-mode.
I think scvim and sced do it similarly.

sincerely,
Marije

> >
> > RJK
> >
> > On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
> >> Yes that's correct. The compiler looks for the .sc extension. It was
> >> the habit of some linux users to name their script files .sc. I and
> >> others felt this was bad practice based on a misconception (i.e.
> >> something like equating .sc with .py). Thus the scd extension was
> >> invented for those who prefer their text 'poor', but nevertheless
> >> clearly marked for purpose.
> >>
> >> S.
> >>
> >> On 22 Dec 2009, at 16:02, Sciss wrote:
> >>> aren't they just plain 8-bit ascii files? the ending is just to
> >>> distinguish class and script files i think
> >>>
> >>> Am 22.12.2009 um 14:56 schrieb ronald kuivila:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Where can I find the actual file format of sc and scd files?
> >>>>
> >>>> RJK

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/