[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] (dur: 0)



Hi James,

ok, I see. So this value should be set in Platform as long as we don't have a better solution.

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Julian Rohrhuber <<mailto:rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On the other hand, it seems that the hack from Pbus also solves the immediate issue in Event:

max(sustain + offset, 1e-9)

this is easier than implementing a new NetAddr..


The hack fails to ensure message order in Linux and Windows because clock time values are much higher magnitude, making 1e-9 below numeric precision. We still need a proper fix.

hjh



--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
<mailto:jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://www.dewdrop-world.net>http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman


--





.

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/