Re: [sc-dev] (dur: 0)

[Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, sure. Looking at it, it seems that bundling is rather ugly in 
implementation. I'd then rather suggest a change in NetAddr that 
bundles messages together if they have a certain property (possibly a 
negative time). This would solve also the ugly implementation of 
Pbus, Pgpar etc.



> Hi James,
>
>  	Not always, you can set non-zero sustain in the pattern, in 
> which case there is no problem.
>
> RJK
>
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:00 PM, James Harkins wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM, ronald kuivila 
> > <<mailto:rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> >  Bundling the gate would be preferable.  (Of course it would be a 
> > sustain of 0 that would trigger this, not dur.)
> >
> >
> > sustain = dur * legato
> >
> > hjh
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > James Harkins /// dewdrop world
> > <mailto:jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <http://www.dewdrop-world.net>http://www.dewdrop-world.net
> >
> > "Come said the Muse,
> > Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> > Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman


--





.

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/