[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] Re: patches for trunk

I tried recompiling the 32-bit UB defining NDEBUG with the -D flag. Still got the crash. Is this NOT the correct way to define that macro?

Best,

Josh

On Dec 4, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:

>>>>> this assertion does not have any influence on the run-time behavior of a
>>>>> release build, though ... it is just an additional type check ...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It does... it crashed the app. A release build of the app.
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure about the rest... I'll check.
>>> 
>>> äh, why should an assertion be triggered in a release build? isn't the
>>> release build on osx done with NDEBUG defined?
>> 
>> grep -R NDEBUG *.xcodeproj
>> 
>> no, seems not. IIRC it's the presence/absence of DEBUG that's been
>> used in the past
> 
> well, then it should be added ... according to c89, NDEBUG is the
> standard macro to be used for disabling code generation for asserts
> statements
> 
> tim
> 
> -- 
> tim@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://tim.klingt.org
> 
> Linux is like a wigwam: no windows, no gates, apache inside, stable.
> 

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/

“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/