[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] Not so EZ Consistency




Am 27.12.2008 um 18:26 schrieb Alberto de Campo:

hi jost,


Alberto,

If I do make ERanger conform, I think I would need to get rid of the
default white background in the labels.

no problem.

I am also not certain about the units label. EZslider doesn't have one,
and it takes aup a lot of space. Just as with ez slider, people can
always put the units in the first label.

I would prefer to keep it as an option at least.

Maybe it would make sense if EZSlider and EZNumber also had
unit labels?


Yes, please !
That would be very useful.


about 20 specs in Spec.specs actually have units.

They could be off by default (make unitWidth nil by default -> no unitsView),
and could be turned on by supplying a unitWidth, like:

EZRanger( ... \freq, ..., unitWidth: 20)

does that make sense?


Would you be bothered if EZRanger just had three schemes:

labelPosition \left (horizontal):

   label-numberbox1-rangeSlider-numberbox2

labelPosition \top:

   label-numberbox1-numberbox2
   rangeSlider

labelPosition \stack (vertical):

   numberbox2
   rangeSlider
   numberbox1
   label

yes, fine.


best, adc
--
--
Alberto de Campo
Bergstrasse 59/33
A-8020 Graz, Austria
e-mail : adc@xxxxxxxx
--

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/