Re: [sc-dev] Not so EZ Consistency

[jostM <sc3@xxxxxxxx>]

Alberto,

If I do make ERanger conform, I think I would need to get rid of the
default white background in the labels.
I am also not certain about the units label. EZslider doesn't have one,
and it takes aup a lot of space. Just as with ez slider, people can
always put the units in the first label. Would you be bothered if
EZRanger just had three schemes:

labelPosition \left (horizontal):

    label-numberbox1-rangeSlider-numberbox2

labelPosition \top:

    label-numberbox1-numberbox2
    rangeSlider

labelPosition \stack (vertical):

    numberbox2
    rangeSlider
    numberbox1
    label


jost


Alberto de Campo wrote:
> hi jost,
>
> thanks for cleaning these up!
>
> as I wrote EZRanger and EZScroller, please go ahead and unify them
> as you see fit.
>
> best, adc
>
>>  >
>>>  But
>>>  of course I think it should have its own gaps and margins (if any) and
>>>  not depend on the parent.
>>>  With EZSlider there is this assumption that it is used horizontally,
>>>  one could put it in an SCHLayoutView
>>>  (I like those simplest kinds of containers, no decorator, no margin,
>>>  gap ;-)
>>>
>> just as a followup, the new EZ will all have funcitonality like the
>> recent EZListView and EZPopUpMenu examples I posted. You can test the
>> examples in the help files, and the new EZSlider and EZNumber will be
>> similar (they have their own argument scheme)
>>
>> jostM
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc-dev mailing list
>>
>> info (subscription, etc.):
>> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
>> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
>
>

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/