Re: [sc-dev] Is there a bug with asRawOSC?

[Sciss <contact@xxxxxxxx>]

[ 9, \default, 1000, 0, 1, \freq, 600, \amp, 0.1 ].asRawOSC.collect 
(_.asAscii)

--> [ #, b, u, n, d, l, e,

... how else should it detect bundles? don't know how the abbreviated  
number commands from Node etc. get through though...


Am 23.12.2008 um 04:34 schrieb James Harkins:

> It seems that message arrays starting with a number for the command  
> index instead of the command name cause asRawOSC to return garbage.
>
> [ 9, \default, 1000, 0, 1, \freq, 600, \amp, 0.1 ].asRawOSC
>
> --> Int8Array[ 35, 98, 117, 110, 100, 108, 101, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 0,  
> 0, 0, 0 ]
>
> ??
>
> hjh
>
>
> : H. James Harkins
> : jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> : http://www.dewdrop-world.net
> .::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:
>
> "Come said the Muse,
> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/