[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing

To: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
From: jostM <sc3@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:32:42 +0100
In-reply-to: <45E52647-E32D-4DCD-9FD2-6575B58D2651@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-id: SuperCollider developers mailing list <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
References: <4950362C.70706@xxxxxxxx> <495038F6.9000705@xxxxxxxx> <45E52647-E32D-4DCD-9FD2-6575B58D2651@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807)

Scott Wilson wrote:
> At some point I think it was suggested that relativeOrigin = true
> would be the default for 3.3.
>
> S.
>
>

yes, but Swing doesn't do it or No?  Wasn't there an RO container
somewhere, was it in curical lib?

I really don't want to use flow layouts. I am finished with the views,
and would have to do them all over. I think maybe I will have to use the
view redirecter for swing, and redirect to the old versions. Not very
elegant.

jost

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/

References:
- [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
  - From: jostM
- Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
  - From: jostM
- Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
  - From: Scott Wilson

Prev by Date: Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
Next by Date: [sc-dev] Is there a bug with asRawOSC?
Previous by thread: Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
Next by thread: Re: [sc-dev] EZ classes and relative origin in Swing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread