Re: [sc-dev] [approve?] Server methods for delegating control

[ronald kuivila <rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good to me.  I think we should explicitly deprecate 'set' as  
well.

RJK

On Dec 22, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Julian Rohrhuber wrote:

> We have discussed this a while ago, I don't find the therad now. I'd  
> propose to commit the following changes (see diff):
>
> # introdude an instance variable remoteControlled (default: true if  
> server is local). This can be set to false if one prefers to isolate  
> a local server.
>
> # instead of Server.set (misleading), Server.all returns the set of  
> all servers. The message set still works, so this shouldn't break  
> anything.
>
> ok to commit?
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> .<server.diff>


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/