Re: [sc-dev] Re: Some 3.3 work

["James Harkins" <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Julian Rohrhuber
<rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Josh, I find that your suggestion is good because it is explicit. We can
> easily write some sclang code that chooses the UGen (Control or Audio), just
> as it currently does with TrigControl. Somehow I wouldn't call it Audio (I
> think it suggests that Control is called Control because it is control rate,
> which I think it isn't.). Maybe AudioControl ? Or actually, in the end,
> Control.ar would be the best, and could implement your point (2).

SynthInput (because that's really what it is - an input to a synth).
Actually Control could then be deprecated and SynthDef would create a
separate SynthInput per rate.

hjh


-- 
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/