Re: [sc-dev] Re: Some 3.3 work

["James Harkins" <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:33 AM, James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> JITLib allows audio patching because it's a higher-level abstraction that
> creates SynthDefs as part of its implementation. Instr/Patch also allows
> audio-rate patching... by (wait for it) creating SynthDefs as part of its
> implementation. Why is it a bad model, to use objects that use SynthDef for
> us?

(To this, I would just add, server-side support for audio-rate mapping
into a Control.ar would allow JITLib and Crucial patching to be
implemented much more simply, and that's a good thing.)

hjh


-- 
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/