[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[sc-dev] Re: Some 3.3 work

On 2008-12-19, Josh Parmenter wrote:
> Rohan - any problems on your end with this? All busses remain 0 based.  

no, of course not.  backwards compatible extensions to scsynth are
never a problem.

i appreciate that maintaining the existing rules can make implementing
new ones more difficult, but i think in this case it is worth the

the scsynth architecture has proven to be remarkably adaptable and
flexible and powerful and simple and elegant, i don't think we should
re-write it lightly.


sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/