Re: [sc-dev] delete s_newargs?

["Dan Stowell" <danstowell@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1 from me

Dan

2008/12/15, ronald kuivila <rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Olaf,
>
>   Probably so.
>
>   If there are no objections, I will go ahead and comment it out and then
> delete it in January before 3.3 goes to bed.
>
>  RJK
>
>  On Dec 15, 2008, at 8:31 AM, sh0099 wrote:
>
>
> > i think in this case there is no need for s_newargs anymore.
> > !?!
> > olaf
> >
> > ronald kuivila schrieb:
> >
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > >
> > >  The [ tags are folded into s_new and n_set.  But s_newargs still exists
> in its current form (i.e., using
> > > counts for each argument).
> > >
> > > I will write up the [ tags and addition of array handling to s_new and
> n_set in the next couple of days.
> > >
> > >
> > > RJK
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 13, 2008, at 2:02 PM, stefan kersten wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > unless i'm missing something, s_newargs is not documented in
> > > > Server-Command-Reference. can someone in the know please add some doc?
> > > > especially wrt how the '[]' typetags are being used ... or has the
> > > > functionality been folded into s_new?

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/