[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] s_newargs

i think in this case there is no need for s_newargs anymore.
!?!
olaf

ronald kuivila schrieb:

Hi Stefan,
The [ tags are folded into s_new and n_set. But s_newargs still exists in its current form (i.e., using 
counts for each argument).
I will write up the [ tags and addition of array handling to s_new and n_set in the next couple of days. 


RJK



On Dec 13, 2008, at 2:02 PM, stefan kersten wrote:


unless i'm missing something, s_newargs is not documented in
Server-Command-Reference. can someone in the know please add some doc?
especially wrt how the '[]' typetags are being used ... or has the
functionality been folded into s_new?

<sk>

_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml 
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/




_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml 
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/




_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/