Re: [sc-dev] 3.3

[thor <th.list@xxxxxxxxx>]

Regarding PlayBuf.

Since the discussion is increasingly about user friendliness, how about
adding an endPos in PlayBuf. SC2 had that.

The traditional answer is on the lines that you can easily do this with
Phasor and BufRd, and another answer is that you can download
LoopBuf and use that. I don't think either of these are good replies.

just 2 pence



On 13 Dec 2008, at 19:07, Dan Stowell wrote:

> 2008/12/13 Scott Wilson <s.d.wilson.1@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On 13 Dec 2008, at 09:59, Dan Stowell wrote:
> >
> > > > As 3.3 will be the official book release, I'd like to make one more
> > > > plea for a slightly less hurried approach to moving towards an RC.
> > >
> > > I definitely think we should have an "alpha" before christmas,  
> > > because
> > > there's some nice new stuff which should be road-tested. If we do  
> > > that
> > > soon, it bears no implication whatsoever on the actual date for the
> > > final release!
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> > > 2008/12/13 stefan kersten <sk@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > > Scott Wilson wrote:
> > > > > Anything else?
> > > >
> > > > i think it would be nice to have SuperColliderAU in the  
> > > > distribution;
> > > > gerard is working on this.
> > >
> > > I vote for this too :)
> > >
> > > Similarly, I'd love it if scplug was in the distribution. It works
> > > nicely; unfortunately there's an evil quirk in Safari that causes
> > > crashes, which I feel is a show-stopper. Otherwise it would work in
> > > Safari + Firefox + all moz-compatible browsers, and I'd definitely
> > > have pushed for adding it months ago. Maybe sk has more on this.
> > >
> > > I would like to add doneAction to PlayBuf, not done that yet.
> >
> > Should we consider BufRd, BufWr, and RecordBuf as well for  
> > consistency? (See
> > the conversation about this with Julian)
>
> I have already done RecordBuf. My feeling is that PlayBuf and
> RecordBuf are the main ones to add it to, since they're the "easy"
> interface to buffer r/w and so should provide for easy synth-freeing
> etc. I wasn't intending to add it to BufRd/BufWr but don't mind if the
> opinion is in favour of adding it to all.
>
> > > I would also like to add the freqscope thing I mentioned for
> > > displaying frequency response curves.
> > >
> > > There was the extra parameter to "/done" messages which Jan was
> > > perhaps going to commit.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sc-dev mailing list
> > >
> > > info (subscription, etc.):
> > > http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> > > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-dev mailing list
> >
> > info (subscription, etc.):
> > http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> > search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.mcld.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
search: https://listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/