[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sc-devel] Platform, Quarks and stand-alones



Hi Dan and Felix,

 Seems like:

if (useSymLinks) {
("ln -s " +  (local.path ++ "/" ++ q.path).escapeChar($ ) +  (dirname ++ "/" ++ q.path).escapeChar($ )).systemCmd;
} {
("cp -r" +  (local.path ++ "/" ++ q.path).escapeChar($ ) +  (dirname ++ "/" ++ q.path ).escapeChar($ )).systemCmd;
};

installs and

("rm -drf" +  (Platform.userExtensionDir ++ "/" ++ local.name ++ "/" ++ q.path).escapeChar($ )).postln.systemCmd;

deinstalls correctly.  Can anyone verify these will work in win32? (seems like they must)

There is the question of what to do on update.  We could add

if (useSymLinks.not) { Quarks.installed.do { | q | Quarks.uninstall(q.name); Quarks.install(q.name) } }

to Quarks:update.  

Finally,  I would propose that the setter of useSymLinks reinstall everything to force consistency (i.e., all quarks are installed installed the same
way, as a symlink or a copy).  

RJK




On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Dan Stowell wrote:

2008/2/27, felix <felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:22 AM, ronald kuivila <rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


3. Insisting on symlinks  breaks the use of Quarks in win32. While Felix'
and James' rant about win32 was entertaining,



yes, and after the quip about the horse I suggested on windows we could
simply copy the folder.

so I already suggested the solution and I've suggested it before but still I
have heard nothing.

Cool, so let's do it. So installation needs a platformy-switch; does
deinstallation? Deinstallation is (currently) by deleting a symlink;
on Windows, would exactly the same mechanism work to delete the
(copied) folder as well as its contents, or does it need something
special, like the equivalent of "rm -rf"?

Dan
_______________________________________________
Sc-devel mailing list