[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sc-devel] server naming conventions cleanup?
Sounds right, in principle someone could write a SynthDef style class
in Java or python or something....
On Feb 9, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Ross Bencina wrote:
Hi Ron, peoples
The real problem is that the design document (Server-Architecture)
does not use the term Graph or GraphDef for the
server side constructs.
The easiest thing to do would be to add some comments clarifying the
between a unit generator and a UGen, a GraphDef and a SynthDef and a
Synth and a Graph.
I think I'm going to give up on the renaming patch.
For now in the book chapter I have written:
The Graph type implements the SuperCollider concept of a Synth.
The GraphDef type implements the SuperCollider concept of a SynthDef.
(Graph and GraphDef in code font, Synth and SynthDef in italics)
This is more general than saying GraphDef relates to the sclang
class... do people feel this is accurate?
Sc-devel mailing list