Re: [Sc-devel] server naming conventions cleanup?

["Ross Bencina" <rossb-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ron, peoples

> The real problem is that the design document (Server-Architecture)
> does not use the term Graph or GraphDef for the
> server side constructs.
>
> The easiest thing to do would be to add some comments clarifying the
> relation
> between a unit generator and a UGen, a GraphDef and a SynthDef and a
> Synth and a Graph.

I think I'm going to give up on the renaming patch.


For now in the book chapter I have written:
The Graph type implements the SuperCollider concept of a Synth.
The GraphDef type implements the SuperCollider concept of a SynthDef.

(Graph and GraphDef in code font, Synth and SynthDef in italics)

This is more general than saying GraphDef relates to the sclang SynthDef 
class... do people feel this is accurate?

Ross.