[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sc-devel] single sample feedback



Well no, we don't need to commit fixes in order to test them. But I
might have misunderstood Nick's suggestion, I'm not sure now.

I have fixes (see my Buffer message) which I would commit but I'm
waiting for discussion first.

Dan


2008/2/4, Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> sorry, I don't understand - we need to commit the fixes for testing
> them? I assumed that the holding back refers to interface changes.
>
>
> >Fixing bugs is good, but in this case Nick had suggested holding off
> >on commits while 3.2rc3 is tested and possibly turns into 3.2, which I
> >think sounds sensible. Can I suggest that we circulate diffs rather
> >than committing, just for this week?
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >2008/2/4, Julian Rohrhuber <rohrhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>  ok, the bug is fixed. Also Dbufrd/wr may have demand streams of
> >>  buffer numbers, and loop values.
> >>  --
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  .
> >>  _______________________________________________
> >>  Sc-devel mailing list
> >>  Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>  http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >http://www.mcld.co.uk
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sc-devel mailing list
> >Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> .
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>


-- 
http://www.mcld.co.uk