[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sc-devel] latency nil request

On Jan 19, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Alberto de Campo wrote:

just tested again how latency nil behaves:

1. patterns break now with latency nil (they did play recently)

That's a side effect of some of the event refactoring. I'll commit a fix in a minute. It's an easy one.

2. events seem to get quantized to the next hardwareBufferSize!
A. I would much prefer having them start at the next block border, and
B. ideally, have OffsetOuts start with their offset time into
the block, so they start less time-quantized.

Now that's weird. Maybe that was always the case? I can't answer to that one.

: H. James Harkins

: jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

: http://www.dewdrop-world.net


"Come said the Muse,

Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,

Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman