[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sc-devel] Alternative to AudioIn?

AudioIn is a VERY early example of creating a class that looked like SC2 usage. SC2 inputs (if I remember correctly) were 1 based, not 0th based. 

I don't use it... just thought I would shed light on the anomaly.


On Jan 16, 2008, at 4:41 AM, Andrea Valle wrote:

No opinion on implementation but from an user perspective it seems to me that the name is a bit misleading. 
I don't think that someone would use it for plugging in SC something different from sound.
(and it has only .ar method, no?)

(really just 2c)


On 16 Jan 2008, at 12:57, Scott Wilson wrote:

One more thought for 3.2:

AudioIn is an anomaly in that it is the only In/Out UGen that uses  
indices starting at 1. This means it must constantly be explained as  
an exception. (Okay, I admit it's a pet peeve...)

How would people feel about deprecating it and adding a new pseudo- 
UGen? HardwareIn?


Sc-devel mailing list

Andrea Valle
Università degli Studi di Torino

Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
(Ken Perlin on noise)

Sc-devel mailing list


/* Joshua D. Parmenter


“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono