Re: [Sc-devel] Alternative to AudioIn?

[Andrea Valle <valle@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

No opinion on implementation but from an user perspective it seems to me that the name is a bit misleading. 

SoundIn?

I don't think that someone would use it for plugging in SC something different from sound.

(and it has only .ar method, no?)

(really just 2c)

-a-

On 16 Jan 2008, at 12:57, Scott Wilson wrote:

One more thought for 3.2:

AudioIn is an anomaly in that it is the only In/Out UGen that uses  

indices starting at 1. This means it must constantly be explained as  

an exception. (Okay, I admit it's a pet peeve...)

How would people feel about deprecating it and adding a new pseudo- 

UGen? HardwareIn?

S.

_______________________________________________

Sc-devel mailing list

Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://lists.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel

--------------------------------------------------

Andrea Valle

--------------------------------------------------

CIRMA - DAMS

Università degli Studi di Torino

--> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/

--> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle

--> andrea.valle@xxxxxxxx

--------------------------------------------------

"

Think of it as seasoning

. noise [salt] is boring

. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring

. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty

"

(Ken Perlin on noise)