Sure... good point. Perhaps there should be a function that can
also be passed in to line up with maxItem and minItem's methods?
What is here should be used for a true evaluation of
function.isNil.if() .
Josh
On Dec 27, 2007, at 8:47 AM, James Harkins wrote:
It works but it's inefficient, because it could require as many as
a.size*2 iterations if the max or min item is last in the array
(where
Click's version maxes out at a.size iterations).
hjh
On Dec 27, 2007 11:39 AM, Josh Parmenter <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
would something like this work?
a = [0, 3, 2, 5, 8, 3, 9, 6, 5]
a.indexOf(a.maxItem)
a.indexOf(a.minItem)
--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net
"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
_______________________________________________
Sc-devel mailing list
Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/
“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether
actively or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes
choices in this regard. He may be conservative or he may subject
himself to continual renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary,
historical or social palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/
_______________________________________________
Sc-devel mailing list
Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel