Re: [Sc-devel] Function:next <=> Function:value?

[James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

Function:p is out because it's already used for Prout. pat{} might be ok.

hjh

On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:00 PM, rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hi Julian, James, and Scott,

  I think I agree that we should not do it.  I think having functions

behave differently inside an event from inside a pattern definition is

just too confusing.

  Instead, we could add a convenience method Function:p or Function:pat to

wrap it in a Pfunc.

 But I do wonder if making the change would break a lot of code  It would

actually be interesting to know where Functions get called with next.

: H. James Harkins

: jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

: http://www.dewdrop-world.net

.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,

Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,

Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman