Re: [Sc-devel] what needs to be done before 3.2?

[Josh Parmenter <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 20, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
> >
>
> Hmm. I think there was a notion of expressing only the fastest  
> possible rate. Is there a reason why that wouldn't work?

Well... BufRd for instance needs a-rate for phase, but can't use k- 
rate. This is the exception rather then the rule though, so perhaps  
this is fine, with special note where needed.
> I'd trod carefully with this. It might be best to make a careful  
> decision and go through the rather tedious and large job of doing  
> this for all the files rather than risk having this patchily and  
> inconsistently added to some files. I don't imagine you're planning  
> to do all of them? ;-)

UGen.subclasses.size
279

yes... daunting! But how can the general user know what kind of input  
is allowable? Since 3.2 is supposed to be a reference for THE  
reference, it seems like this should be included. If not now, when?

I certainly can't do all of these, bit perhaps if a number of us each  
took a UGen source file?

Josh
>

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/

“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own  
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively  
or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this  
regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual  
renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social  
palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/