Re: [Sc-devel] Re: Quarks and svn

[Scott Wilson <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey felix,

> I agree.  including a bundle of quarks (that are up to date and  
> work with the binary that you just downloaded) is a fine idea.
>
> expecting those quarks to update is not a good idea.  the binary  
> doesn't update, so let's not expect to update the quark either.


I thought one of the points of the system is that you could get easy  
updates? (I seem to remember some people extolling that as a virtue...)

I would assume anything that is update-able would be tested against  
the current point release anyway, or?

S.