Re: [Sc-devel] MultiTap

[Josh Parmenter <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

MultiTap was a backwards compat item from the SC2 days, and I'd be  
surprised if anyone uses it. Buffer is last because that was different  
from SC2 (where there were no buffers). Tap with an array and .sum  
will mimic this functionality, and I think that would be the better  
way to do it. I'm not sure how much, if any, code it would break. I  
know I stopped using it long ago... I would suggest placing a .madd in  
Tap, and removing it myself. Then showing on sc-users and probably in  
a 'new in 3.2 file' that MultiTap is gone, and here is how you do it  
with Tap.

Josh

On Dec 10, 2007, at 5:05 AM, nescivi wrote:

> Hiho,
>
> I am just noticing that compared to all the other Buffer Delay  
> UGens, MultiTap
> is the only one which has the bufnum argument as the last one, while  
> all the
> others have it as their first. It has it even after mul and add...
> Also it has "in" as the third argument, while the others have it as  
> the
> second.
>
> Should we change for 3.2 this to make it consistent?
> Or would this break too much code?
>
> sincerely,
> Marije
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel

******************************************
/* Joshua D. Parmenter
http://www.realizedsound.net/josh/

“Every composer – at all times and in all cases – gives his own  
interpretation of how modern society is structured: whether actively  
or passively, consciously or unconsciously, he makes choices in this  
regard. He may be conservative or he may subject himself to continual  
renewal; or he may strive for a revolutionary, historical or social  
palingenesis." - Luigi Nono
*/