Re: [Sc-devel] SuperCollider 3.2 dates; 32nd December?

[nescivi <nescivi@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 02 December 2007 17:22:10 Dan Stowell wrote:
> Building on our 3.1 experience may I suggest we use the (fairly
> common) methodology of "release candidates"? We need to be very sure
> that SC 3.2 is nice and stable, and our approach to 3.1 included
> various last-minute things and ended up leading to the need for 3.1.1
> as a bugfix release. Not a major problem, but a little untidy.
>
> I'm OK with your suggested deadline, Nick - perhaps that can be the
> deadline at which SC 3.2rc1 can be released to the general community?
> Then after (say) two weeks, if it seems comfortable and stable we
> rename it SC 3.2 (without adding any more modifications!). Otherwise
> we produce SC 3.2rc2. Seems a lot of o/s software uses this approach
> (e.g. everything from mozillaland) so it might be helpful.

this seems like a good idea...

debugging and testing in the first week of january will be in a time of travel 
again for me... so I might need the extra time :)

sincerely,
Marije