[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Sc-devel] IdentityDictionary : at

To: sc-dev <sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Sc-devel] IdentityDictionary : at
From: Sciss <contact@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 01:10:28 +0100
List-archive: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/pipermail/sc-devel>
List-help: <mailto:sc-devel-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=help>
List-id: <sc-devel.create.ucsb.edu>
List-post: <mailto:sc-devel@create.ucsb.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel>, <mailto:sc-devel-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel>, <mailto:sc-devel-request@create.ucsb.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

hello,

should IdentityDictionary's at not be

	at { arg key;

instead of

	at { arg key, value;

?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sc-devel] IdentityDictionary : at
  - From: Dan Stowell

Prev by Date: Re: [Sc-devel] [BUG] bugs with n_setn and s_getn?
Next by Date: [Sc-devel] (Identity)Dictionary : includesKey performance
Previous by thread: Re: [Sc-devel] [BUG] 1.0 + 0.0 = 0.0?
Next by thread: Re: [Sc-devel] IdentityDictionary : at
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread