Re: [Sc-devel] [RFC] sample accurate scheduling

[blackrain <blackrain.sc@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 1, 2007 1:09 PM, Jan Trutzschler <sc3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think Scott is right. I think the server should only have the
> option to run its scheduler on the hardware's sample clock.
> j

this could be yet another approach (if I understand right).
have scsynth 'main' clock be the hardware's sample clock and translate
osc packets timestamps to that - it sounds like quite some work and a
bit risky.
I believe keeping the scheduling model we have and implementing
SampleClock in the lang side is a more straight forward approach.

x

> On Dec 1, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>
> > Why not simply use timestamps in seconds and then maintain OSC
> > compatibility rather than implement a new message and queue? If the
> > clock is the same everything should align correctly, yes?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sc-devel mailing list
> Sc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-devel
>