Re: [sc-dev] its time for a User library

[ronald kuivila <rkuivila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > -A Common Lib suggests something that supports the whole of the
> >  system and is important to the functioning of it. Without Common  
> > Lib SC
> > won't run.UserLib is a private library or rather specific to one  
> > way of
> > doing things

There are lots of separable libs in Common already, like Patterns and  
there are also the different GUI
dialects.
Maybe there should be UserLibs and ExtensionLibs.
An ExtensionLib would be a specific class of added capabilities (like  
google API).

RJK

On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:11 AM, crucial felix wrote:

> And further to that the Common lib should be kept small and not try  
> to generalize
> its support too much. Any specific areas that are being supported  
> (like internet tools -
> if someone added SOAP and google API tools)
> should be developed in the UserLib so that people can selectively  
> install that.
>
> Which suggests now that "User Lib" is a slightly limited name.
> Maybe "Code Respository"
>
> On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:
>
> > > But doesn't that correspond to migrating
> > > specific classes out of a UserLib and into Common?
> > -A Common Lib suggests something that supports the whole of the
> >  system and is important to the functioning of it. Without Common  
> > Lib SC
> > won't run.UserLib is a private library or rather specific to one  
> > way of
> > doing things
> > depends on a lot of things of course), without that SC can work  
> > quite nicely.
> >
> > AvS
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev