[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [sc-dev] its time for a User library

And further to that the Common lib should be kept small and not try to generalize its support too much. Any specific areas that are being supported (like internet tools -
if someone added SOAP and google API tools)
should be developed in the UserLib so that people can selectively install that.

Which suggests now that "User Lib" is a slightly limited name.
Maybe "Code Respository"

On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:

But doesn't that correspond to migrating
specific classes out of a UserLib and into Common?
-A Common Lib suggests something that supports the whole of the
system and is important to the functioning of it. Without Common Lib SC won't run.UserLib is a private library or rather specific to one way of
doing things
depends on a lot of things of course), without that SC can work quite nicely.