Re: [sc-dev] its time for a User library

[crucial felix <felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And further to that the Common lib should be kept small and not try  
to generalize
its support too much. Any specific areas that are being supported  
(like internet tools -
if someone added SOAP and google API tools)
should be developed in the UserLib so that people can selectively  
install that.

Which suggests now that "User Lib" is a slightly limited name.
Maybe "Code Respository"

On Mar 1, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote:

> > But doesn't that correspond to migrating
> > specific classes out of a UserLib and into Common?
> -A Common Lib suggests something that supports the whole of the
>  system and is important to the functioning of it. Without Common  
> Lib SC
> won't run.UserLib is a private library or rather specific to one  
> way of
> doing things
> depends on a lot of things of course), without that SC can work  
> quite nicely.
>
> AvS