Re: [sc-dev] sourceforge svn

[Christopher Frauenberger <frauenberger@xxxxxx>]

I vote for switching to Subversion as soon as possible, from my  
experience SVN is a lot easier, more powerful and also safer than   
CVS. I particularly like the fact that you can move files easily and  
directories are version controlled in the same way as files are.

There are also quite nice clients for svn:
http://scplugin.tigris.org/ - OS X finder integration
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ - Windows Explorer integration

or of course you could also just use the svn command from the shell,  
which works very much the same way as cvs.

I think it would be pretty safe to switch as sourceforge made an  
extensive beta-test with their subversion and everything looks stable.

Chris

On 26 Feb 2006, at 15:29, crucial felix wrote:

> I think the dust has already settled.  CVS hasn't exactly been  
> smooth :)
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:39 PM, stefan kersten wrote:
>
> > now that sourceforge also hosts svn, how switching? or wait
> > until the dust settles down?
> >
> > <sk>
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-dev mailing list
> > sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev