Re: [sc-dev] demand rate

[Arie van Schutterhoef <arsche@xxxxxxxxx>]

>Things like Spawn, TSpawn and Sequencer were not good to lose.
-We still use SC2 for this reason actually. Recently we tried
 to put things into SC3, but we're scratching our heads over this...

>I never intended the current state to be the end. I always intended
>on making a fat server that included the language as a plugin that
>supported Sequencer and TSpawn.
-Any prospect on when this will be done?

>The OSC implementation  on SC2 was better.
-Intriguing,,,

AvS


  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................

  `    |Schreck Ensemble    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +

    `  |# -laboratory for live electro-acoustic music- #            |
       |             http://www.schreck.nl/                         |
       |             http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/                 |
     ` *===========================================================++
     ` |Compositions http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/compo.html  |
     ` |Samples      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/samp.html   |
     ` |Patches      http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/pat.html    |
     ` |Videos       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/video.html  |

     ` |Scores       http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/scores.html |

       *===========================================================++
  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....................................................................