Re: [sc-dev] [approve] Function-bund

[Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, but trying to save typing, which is the basic point after all. :-)

Other suggestions for a name?

S.

On 30 Dec 2005, at 00:01, James Harkins wrote:

> Maybe just a naming thing. .bund implies that you will get a bundle 
> back.
>
> .sendBundle might be better:
>
> {
>   b = Buffer.alloc(...);
>   .. .. ..
> }.sendBundle;
>
> hjh
>
> On 12/29/05, Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well, it's not worth it then to me anyway, as I almost never do that,
> > and thus don't see the point of a shortcut. For cases where you want
> > the bundle back I'd be happy with makeBundle.
>
> --
> James Harkins /// dewdrop world
> jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.dewdrop-world.net
>
> "Come said the Muse,
> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev