Re: [sc-dev] [approve] Function-bund

[James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe just a naming thing. .bund implies that you will get a bundle back.

.sendBundle might be better:

{
  b = Buffer.alloc(...);
  .. .. ..
}.sendBundle;

hjh

On 12/29/05, Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, it's not worth it then to me anyway, as I almost never do that,
> and thus don't see the point of a shortcut. For cases where you want
> the bundle back I'd be happy with makeBundle.

--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman