Re: [sc-dev] [approve] Function-bund

[James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'd prefer it if it returned the bundle without sending it. Then it's
up to you what you do with it after that.

hjh

On 12/29/05, Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I quite often find myself needing to bundle a few things that need to
> be sent immediately, i.e. latency isn't an issue, but I want them to be
> executed simultaneously.
>
> It occurred to me that a shortcut might be nice for this:
>
> + Function {
>
>         bund { arg server;
>                 (server ? Server.default).makeBundle(nil, this);
>         }
>
> }
>
> Useful? Bloat?
>
> S.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev
>
>
>


--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
jamshark70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman