Re: [sc-dev] [Approve?] Add 'Extensions' directories to compiler

[Josh Parmenter <joshp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree... getting rid of scwork would be a good idea in favor of the 
~/Library option.

josh

******************************************
Joshua D. Parmenter
Graduate Student, Music Composition
http://students.washington.edu/joshp

"...Some people think a composer's supposed to please them, but in a way 
a composer is a chronicler... He's supposed to report on what he's seen 
and lived."
                                                        					-Charles 
Mingus


sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > ~/Library/Application Support/ is the proper place for application
> > specific supporting files on OS X. Class libraries fit in this category
> > perfectly.
> > ~/scwork is probably not a good place for documents.
> > ~/Documents/SuperCollider or something like that might be better.
> > So if anything, I would change ~/scwork, not the other way around.
>
>
> IMHO startup.rtf should live in ~/Library/Application
> Support/SuperCollider/. Then we wouldn't need ~/scwork/. As it is now, I
> only use it for the startup file, and I suspect this is commonly the case.
>
> I also still think there should be a global startup file, which could
> logically live in /Library/Application Support/SuperCollider/. But maybe
> that's just my problem as we're working in a lab situation and are moving
> to multiple user accounts.
>
> S.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev