Re: [sc-dev] Buffer gen methods

[James Harkins <jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, Dec 6, 2004, at 18:53 US/Eastern, Scott Wilson wrote:

> I've just about got the new help for Buffer done, and I noticed that 
> sine2 and sine3 seem to have just been implemented as copies of sine1. 
> This should work, but perhaps separate args for freqs, amps, and 
> phases would be better IMO. If no one objects I'll change this.

One advantage to the current way is that the frequencies array is 
compatible with message style. But I can see why it would be clearer to 
have the different arguments.

It will break some of my pieces, but I can fix them. The new way would 
be clearer to read I think.
hjh
____________________________________

H. James Harkins /// dewdrop_world
http://www.dewdrop-world.net

"If attacked by a lion, thrust your arm down his throat.
This takes some practice."  -- Cyril Connolly