Re: [sc-dev] [rfc] alternative documentation format, scwiki

[stefan kersten <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2004-11-27 21:23:29 +0100, Julian Rohrhuber wrote:
> >If the help files had to be human edited using markup, I think there 
> >would be a lot less help.
> >Linux needs a styled text format. Then rtf could be converted to that.
> 
> I agree that styled text is really important.

but why? i must be a real geek ...

> I always wonder though why there is no simple reduced html
> editor (WYSIWYG) using stylesheets at the head of the
> document. It would be very portable, and fairly simple.

there actually is (or will be): mozilla [1]. i personally
think html (with a decent editor) is ok, but i think you
wouldn't want to go that route for SC code because the html
source would be unreadable. i'm not sure a stylesheet can do
syntax highlighting.

<sk>

[1] http://www.mozilla.org/editor/