Re: [sc-dev] was Re: [sc-users] [commit] new MIDI helpfile

[Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suspect this wouldn't work with NRT, as currently NRT is effectively 
server-side only. I have wondered however if it mightn't be possible to 
have an NRT mode with the internal server that would allow client and 
server NRT activity. This would perhaps be ideal, as it could allow for 
easily interchangeable code, as we had in SC2 with Synth.write and 
Synth.collect.

S.

On 27 Nov 2004, at 15:08, Joshua Parmenter wrote:

> Especially if this was something that could work in NRT also.  The 
> loss of OSCresponder in NRT has been talked about a bit.  In that 
> sense, it could also be used from a MIDI file that is being fed into 
> SC.
>
> Josh
>
> ******************************************
> Joshua D. Parmenter
> Graduate Student, Music Composition
> http://students.washington.edu/joshp
>
> "...Some people think a composer's supposed to please them, but in a 
> way a composer is a chronicler... He's supposed to report on what he's 
> seen and lived."
>                                                         					-Charles 
> Mingus
> On Nov 27, 2004, at 4:58 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
>
> > What would that look like? You would still need to register it 
> > somewhere I assume?
> >
> > S.
> >
> > On 27 Nov 2004, at 11:53, James McCartney wrote:
> >
> > > I think both MIDI and OSC responders could be gotten rid of and 
> > > replaced with a mechanism where you fork a thread and wait for a 
> > > certain kind of event.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sc-users mailing list
> > > sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-users mailing list
> > sc-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev