Re: [sc-dev] Bug in CollStream-reset or ArrayedCollection-extend?

[James McCartney <asynth@xxxxxx>]

why do you want to change it? CollStream always begins writing at the beginning of a collection. If you pass it a new collection, it begins writing from the beginning of that. 
CollStream is not for appending to collections.

On Nov 21, 2004, at 11:21 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:

> On 21 Nov 2004, at 18:58, James McCartney wrote:
> > Why do you want to remove it?
> At the moment *on and on call reset:
>
> <x-tad-smaller>	*on { </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>arg</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> aCollection; 
> ^</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>super</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>.new.on(aCollection); 
> }
> on { </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>arg</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> aCollection;
> collection = aCollection;
> </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>this</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>.reset;
> }
> </x-tad-smaller>
> This obliterates the collection you just passed in. So I guess I should change on to call super.reset instead?
>
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
> sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev