Re: [sc-dev] Bug in CollStream-reset or ArrayedCollection-extend?

[Scott Wilson <sdwilson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 21 Nov 2004, at 18:58, James McCartney wrote:
> Why do you want to remove it?
At the moment *on and on call reset:

<x-tad-smaller>	*on { </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>arg</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> aCollection; 
^</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>super</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>.new.on(aCollection); 
}
on { </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>arg</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> aCollection;
collection = aCollection;
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>this</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>.reset;
}
</x-tad-smaller>
This obliterates the collection you just passed in. So I guess I should change on to call super.reset instead?

S.