Re: [sc-dev] [Comments?]XML doc? Fwd: html doc

[Orm Finnendahl <finnendahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 06. Februar 2004, 09:26 Uhr (-0800) schrieb James McCartney:
> 
> That means we'd need an XML parser and scripts to parse it. If the 
> scripts were in SC, then fine. I would not want to begin adding a bunch 
> of Perl/Python/Ruby scripts to SC. But in that case why use XML? Why 
> not just write the doc in SC?

The idea was mainly to maintain one source of the documentation and
then generate different outputs from that source. In that case any
output format easily integratable into SC (even SC itself as you
suggest) can get generated from this source without having to add any
scripts in foreign languages to SC itself.

Or do you mind to have the documentation project seperated from SC
(with its own parsing and transformation tools) altogether?

--
Orm