If a function takes 0.1 seconds to return
its result and you schedule the function to execute
200 times with 0.001 seconds between onsets, down she
goes.
I don't see it as a bug, just a reasonable limitation.
This kind of scheduling could probably be made "safer"
but that might have a negative impact on performance
overall.
H. James
--- nikolai collinsky <nikolaicollinsky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
//this crashes SC3-
100.do({SystemClock.sched(4.0.rand,{1.0.rand.postln;})})
scheduling queue size restriction?
(can get round by converting absolute scheduling to
delta time scheduling to use less clocks but still,
would be nice to have safe scheduling
possibilities...)
=====
____ James Harkins /// dewdrop world
\ / jamshark70@xxxxxxxxx
\/ http://www.duke.edu/~jharkins
"... love and hot pants, peace, harmony..."
-- Dick Lee, Hot Pants: The Musical
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
sc-dev mailing list
sc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.create.ucsb.edu/mailman/listinfo/sc-dev