Re: [sc-dev] SuperCollider 3 versioning

[Gabriel Suerte <geekear@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Since downloading a snapshot is the only surefire way
non-developers have of obtaining a buildable SC3, perhaps
the timestamps on these binaries (with matching source code)
could serve as low-cost version numbers?

--Gabriel



On Wednesday, December 3, 2003, at 05:56 AM, Kasper Souren wrote:

> I wonder why SuperCollider 3 doesn't have version numbers beyond the 
> major
> version (i.e. 3). I think it could make things a bit clearer, to both 
> users
> and	developers.
>
> A related issue: Is SC3 considered stable on Mac OS X? And if not, 
> what needs
> to be done for this? And for Linux: what needs to be done?
>
> I don't like the word 'roadmap', but it might be nice to have one for 
> SC...
>
> bye,
> Kasper