Re: [sc-dev] Linux development?

[stefan kersten <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>]

James McCartney wrote:
> > would the use of portaudio (1) be a viable alternative? it features a
> > common interface to audio devices on macos, macosx, linux, etc. and has a
> > non-restrictive license.
> 
> Actually I like JACK better, so hang on to your changes and wait for the GPL
> version to integrate them.

yes, jack is more advanced.  OTOH portaudio has the same interface on all
platforms and a jack-client implementation is being worked on.  i don't now how
both libraries compare WRT latency, though.

<sk>