Re: [sc-dev] supercollider tree

[felix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 08:27 PM, Ian Pojman wrote:

> James / everyone - what are your thoughts?

also, about the final product directory structure:

i was thinking that documents relating to the individual user (music) 
should be outside
of the sc application folder.  maybe in ~/Documents/SuperCollider

especially if we build early, build often: we need to be able to
get a new sc version and install it easily without disturbing our other 
work folders.

engine/synthdefs maybe as well.

for the most part this can be a user decision, but we should 'ship' it 
so that its laid out logically.


> On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 01:22 PM, JT wrote:
>
> > Ian Pojman <ipojman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > couple questions. I'm setting up a preliminary CVS module.

good man.

> > > b) How about a reorganization of the source.
> > >
> > > The stuff seems a bit jumbled, but maybe it's just because I haven't
> > > read thru most of the actual source yet.
> > >
> > > but before starting a CVS module, now is an opportune time to lay out
> > > the directories in a clear manner.
> > >
> > > I was thinking of something like this (old dir names in ()'s)
> > >
> > > supercollider (SuperCollider 3)

i like SuperCollider3

> > >     [pb project file, etc.]
> > >     -etc - BBall.icns
> > >     -src	
> > > 	- client
> > > 		[cocoa source (source)]
> > > 	- server (SC_server lang)
> > > 		-lang (language related - BufSource, OSX etc would be put in
> > > here if nowhere else?)
> > > 			- core (LangSource)
> > > 			- primitives (LangPrimSource)
> > > 			- OSC (OSC Source)
> > > 			- synth (SynthSource)
> > >
> > > you guys think this is worth merit, or should we just start off as it 
> > > is.

you're right, it should be rearranged now, before we dig in.

> > I think it would be better to have it a bit organized especially
> > when you put it into CVS. it can be a mess if only one person is
> > doing the development but once it becomes a group effort, it should
> > be as organized as possible.
> >
> > I personlly like the directory structure you have proposed.
> > I believe this is what James meant when he asked the sc-users list
> > whether someone can make the source tree suitable for sourceforge/CVS 
> > development.
>
>
> - Ian
____________________
http://crucial-systems.com